<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickSilver &#124; Mac Launch Utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/</link>
	<description>Mac Software to Make Life Easier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSin</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>To over simplify Quicksilver by labeling it an application launcher is, in my mind, comparable to labeling your favorite automobile an &quot;mp3 player.&quot; Howard Melman has compiled an excellent Quicksilver User&#039;s Guide in PDF format for the latest version of Quicksilver, Î²51. It can be downloaded here: http://mysite.verizon.net/hmelman/Quicksilver.pdf
I agree, if all one uses Quicksilver for is an application launcher, then ho-hum would be correct. If one, on the other hand, were willing to dig just a bit deeper - Whoa, I didn&#039;t know I could do this with Quicksilver, would be the expected and appropriate reaction, in my opinion of course - your mileage may vary. So dig, grasshopper, dig :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To over simplify Quicksilver by labeling it an application launcher is, in my mind, comparable to labeling your favorite automobile an &#8220;mp3 player.&#8221; Howard Melman has compiled an excellent Quicksilver User&#8217;s Guide in PDF format for the latest version of Quicksilver, Î²51. It can be downloaded here: <a href="http://mysite.verizon.net/hmelman/Quicksilver.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.verizon.net/hmelman/Quicksilver.pdf</a><br />
I agree, if all one uses Quicksilver for is an application launcher, then ho-hum would be correct. If one, on the other hand, were willing to dig just a bit deeper &#8211; Whoa, I didn&#8217;t know I could do this with Quicksilver, would be the expected and appropriate reaction, in my opinion of course &#8211; your mileage may vary. So dig, grasshopper, dig <img src='http://www.scottkellam.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Oban, 

Im glad you agree.  I hear how great Quicksilver is all the time, and it&#039;s just not for me.  I do encourage people to at least try it out though; it looks great and is simple to use.  You never know you might really like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oban, </p>
<p>Im glad you agree.  I hear how great Quicksilver is all the time, and it&#8217;s just not for me.  I do encourage people to at least try it out though; it looks great and is simple to use.  You never know you might really like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oban89</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>oban89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/quicksilver-mac-launch-utility/#comment-975</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a great post!  I&#039;ve been wondering what I was missing wiht Quicksilver.  I checked it out briefly about a month ago, but couldn&#039;t get excited about  it either.  But everytime I hear someone mention it and how much they love it, I wonder what I&#039;m missing.  

It&#039;s refreshing to finally see someone write about something they don&#039;t find cool.  I can now rest comfortably knowing that I&#039;m not missing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a great post!  I&#8217;ve been wondering what I was missing wiht Quicksilver.  I checked it out briefly about a month ago, but couldn&#8217;t get excited about  it either.  But everytime I hear someone mention it and how much they love it, I wonder what I&#8217;m missing.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s refreshing to finally see someone write about something they don&#8217;t find cool.  I can now rest comfortably knowing that I&#8217;m not missing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

