<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac BitTorrent Client Round-up</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/mac-bittorrent-client-round-up/</link>
	<description>Mac Software to Make Life Easier</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: brady</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/mac-bittorrent-client-round-up/#comment-1255</link>
		<author>brady</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkellam.com/os-x-software/mac-bittorrent-client-round-up/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>these are the 3 most popular? is that a joke? azureus is the primary choice of any bittorrent user on a private tracker, and it's still the only client on OS X worth using. not a single one of the other clients supports features as basic as RC4 encryption or file selection. it's not pretty, and it's java-based, making it a little slow, but it's the only client that offers the user any number of extremely important features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are the 3 most popular? is that a joke? azureus is the primary choice of any bittorrent user on a private tracker, and it&#8217;s still the only client on OS X worth using. not a single one of the other clients supports features as basic as RC4 encryption or file selection. it&#8217;s not pretty, and it&#8217;s java-based, making it a little slow, but it&#8217;s the only client that offers the user any number of extremely important features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
